#21
Posted 22 December 2011 - 08:50 PM
FUCK OFF , muncher of the pies

#22
Posted 22 December 2011 - 08:53 PM
After all, he obviously enjoys making money, thats why he went to england and turkey. Money is one thing the huns do not have.
Fuck, we could offer him a reserve players wages and it would still be higher than what they could give him. If we did go after him and they did too, maybe he would use his brain ( if he has one) and come here because he knows the huns are down the shiter.
anyway, either way am not fussed, if he comes then fine, I would support him if he could score us goals to win the league, if he doesnt then he is still a fat, manky ex Hun to me

GRAFFITI ON THE WALL...
#23
Posted 22 December 2011 - 08:53 PM
if you are reading this boyd and considering your options , here is a wee clue as how us tims feel about you coming here
FUCK OFF , muncher of the pies
id say its 50/50 what the fans want looking at the posts on this thread so far
#24
Posted 22 December 2011 - 08:57 PM
id say its 50/50 what the fans want looking at the posts on this thread so far
no really football fans there if you are honest , because if they rate a guy like boyd and want him in the team, well , enough said
whats the point in having a striker who cant score outside scotland , would mean having to juggle the team around every game in europe or against them or the likes of hearts etc, and would a more prolific striker sit on the bench most weeks and be willing to be only used in bigger games then make way for him every other week? doubt it

#25
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:00 PM
no really football fans there if you are honest , because if they rate a guy like boyd and want him in the team, well , enough said
whats the point in having a striker who cant score outside scotland , would mean having to juggle the team around every game in europe or against them or the likes of hearts etc, and would a more prolific striker sit on the bench most weeks and be willing to be only used in bigger games then make way for him every other week? doubt it
sp the people that said yes to boyd arent real football fans now?
WTF rofl
#26
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:04 PM
sp the people that said yes to boyd arent real football fans now?
WTF rofl
you are a muppet sir
a rolling about the floor reply , very grown up

#27
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:06 PM
#28
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:41 PM
you are the muppet son, you were cheeky aw day last saturday, noo yer callin people here " no real fans" very grown up kid
think you are getting me mixed up with somebody else

#29
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:43 PM
#30
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:04 PM
#31
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:07 PM
#32
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:35 PM
na get boyd to fuck. When i was at school playing football we had a word for people who played like him. Basically a 'mooncher' was someone who hung around in front of the goals and waited for tap ins or rebounds while everyone else did the work. Mooncher's especially got stick if we were playing knockout.
Mooncher=Poacher=Goals
Gary Lineker
Mo Johnston
Ally McCoist
John Robertson (Hearts)
Were all Moonchers pal and highly productive wee moonchin bassa's they all were too..............
Opinions are like arseholes
We all have them and sometimes they are full of shit...
SPL CHAMPIONS 2012-13
#33
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:50 PM
alright a hell of alot more mobile than boyd but he is most effective in the box. Like Boyd.
just saying.

GRAFFITI ON THE WALL...
#34
Posted 22 December 2011 - 11:35 PM
Hooper and Stokes are far better players than this fat hun! And i would think they will only be able to stump up wages by letting someone go.......hopefully Jelavic.
#35
Posted 23 December 2011 - 02:19 PM
i don't think i'd compare him to those players though, he can't run the fatso. Would rather a powerful striker who can head it but also run as well. Can't say i ever seen robertson play but boyd wouldn't compare to the other 3 for me at all.Mooncher=Poacher=Goals
Gary Lineker
Mo Johnston
Ally McCoist
John Robertson (Hearts)
Were all Moonchers pal and highly productive wee moonchin bassa's they all were too..............
#36
Posted 23 December 2011 - 02:33 PM
#37
Posted 23 December 2011 - 08:21 PM

#38
Posted 23 December 2011 - 09:09 PM
i don't think i'd compare him to those players though, he can't run the fatso. Would rather a powerful striker who can head it but also run as well. Can't say i ever seen robertson play but boyd wouldn't compare to the other 3 for me at all.
They were all poachers Culch that is the point I was making.
heres the stats for the above and Boyd till present remembering he has a good 5-6 years left in him at 28.
LINEKER:
466 Games 243 Goals
MCMOIST:
590 Games 292 Goals
MoJUDAS:
683 Games 236 Goals
ROBERTSON:
569 Games 229 Goals
BOYD:
335 Games 176 Goals
So you see his goal tally wont be to far off the rest once he start hitting the 500 game mark which I reckon love him or hate him puts him right up their with some good poachers.
Poaching is a dying art at most sides demand that the front me get involved outside the box as well but you cannot deny how effective and dangerous a poacher can be if its done successfully?
Wee Robertson was a good goalscorer for Hearts and considering his height he could get tore in as well.
Still hated the wee cnut though!
Opinions are like arseholes
We all have them and sometimes they are full of shit...
SPL CHAMPIONS 2012-13
#39
Posted 23 December 2011 - 11:42 PM
he is a diving cheating scumbag is nowhere near worthy of even looking at a celtic jersey.
our survey says XXX

#40
Posted 23 December 2011 - 11:55 PM
wit boyd though the whole team's work is centred around setting him up. When he left rangers goalscoring didn't suffer as they now had more variation. Miller scored loads of goals after he left because he was getting into the box, and the others stepped up also. And any old firm or european game boyd was left out because he was a waste of a shirt. I would prefer to be the way we are now, goals coming from different areas of the team rather than boyd reaping the rewards of everyone else's good work while doing no work himself. Another example is man united and ruud van horseface, the best poacher in recent years (only scored 1 goal from outside the box for united). He scored loads for united yet didn't contribute much else. He leaves and united look a much better team. Ronaldo and rooney stepped up and took responsibility for scoring goals, and the whole team looked more fluid. And boyd is certainly no van the man.They were all poachers Culch that is the point I was making.
heres the stats for the above and Boyd till present remembering he has a good 5-6 years left in him at 28.
LINEKER:
466 Games 243 Goals
MCMOIST:
590 Games 292 Goals
MoJUDAS:
683 Games 236 Goals
ROBERTSON:
569 Games 229 Goals
BOYD:
335 Games 176 Goals
So you see his goal tally wont be to far off the rest once he start hitting the 500 game mark which I reckon love him or hate him puts him right up their with some good poachers.
Poaching is a dying art at most sides demand that the front me get involved outside the box as well but you cannot deny how effective and dangerous a poacher can be if its done successfully?
Wee Robertson was a good goalscorer for Hearts and considering his height he could get tore in as well.
Still hated the wee cnut though!
Content Spy
-
New Topic 06:00 PM Story of Celtic coming to a cinema near you 0 replies CelticTalk The Maestro -
New Reply 04:58 PM European Ambition 4 replies CelticTalk marmarisbhoy -
New Reply 04:55 PM European Ambition 3 replies CelticTalk YB67 -
New Reply 04:48 PM European Ambition 2 replies CelticTalk YB67 -
New Reply 04:31 PM European Ambition 1 reply CelticTalk marmarisbhoy -
New Topic 04:24 PM European Ambition 0 replies CelticTalk YB67














